Earth’s urban population will grow by 2.5 billion people over the next 30 years. Over the same time period, urban land expansion put at risk the survival of 855 different species and will threaten the homes of over 30,000 animal and plant species. Add in the impact of climate change and everywhere, cities are in crisis. Manifestations include:
To reverse the decline in biodiversity by 2030, our analysis suggests that, globally, we need to spend between US$ 722-967 billion each year over the next ten years. That puts the biodiversity financing gap at an average US$ 711 billion or between US$ 598-824 billion per year.
Financing Nature, Closing the Global Biodiversity Financing Gap, The Paulson Institute
Existing systemic gaps act as roadblocks to raising the massive amount of capital necessary to address the problems of cities in crisis.
Currently, governments and philanthropy finance the protection and enhancement of natural assets. Woefully insufficient nature-funding continues to shrink as governments grapple with budgets stretched by the costs incurred to fight the Covid-19 pandemic. And, the public sector has to find the required monies to repair and expand grey infrastructure to provide for burgeoning populations.
Banks, pension funds, insurance companies, money managers, family offices, trusts, and other investors all share similar criteria. They have obligations to their depositors to:
Canada has no proven market to trade financial instruments that invest in nature. Also, very few sizeable transactions exist that allow for the evaluation of the risks and consideration of the mitigating factors of nature-based financing. Few transactions means even fewer trades of the underlying obligations – so no depth of market and very little liquidity. Perversely, investment continues into industrial agriculture, mining, the fossil fuel industry and other industries that have a direct detrimental impact on biodiversity and nature. However, these sectors have market maturity, proven track records, and high levels of liquidity that make investment opportunities attractive.
To shift the immense amounts capital being invested into the sectors that lead to nature and biodiversity loss to finance nature and biodiversity.
Nature enhances the value of private assets. Privately held real estate captures most of that value. As stated above, governments and philanthropy finance almost all investment in natural assets. Only a fraction of that investment is recouped through existing mechanisms such as taxes.
Akin to infrastructure, nature requires significant upfront investment and provisions for annual maintenance. Yet, nature does provide benefits. But those benefits are challenging to assess and monetize due to the lack of any recognized accounting standards.
We need a mechanism that links repayment and debt servicing of investment into natural infrastructure to the proven value that it creates and that accrues to the private sector .
Currently, governments pay for the development and maintenance of city parks and other natural assets such as rain gardens, biodiversity patches, urban forests, rivers, and ponds. Accounting’s historic cost concept and depreciation do not recognize the true value of natural assets on city balance sheets. They are often recorded at nominal value. As such, they are particularly vulnerable to the vagaries of changing government policies and shifting budget priorities.
‘This study calculated the value of a major public park as £108 million. It may come as a shock to learn that most councils value public parks at just £1 each’
Making the invisible visible: the real value of park assets
Other than for altruistic reasons, private landowners have little motivation to be good guardians for natural assets they may own. Maintenance costs are a drag on operating income and parkland preservation reduces development capacity and profit.
Natural assets require legal protections and stewardship independent of fickle governments and profit-driven land owners to ensure these assets continue to contribute to neighbourhood resilience . This will require stakeholders that understand the role the natural assets play in the health of unique communities.
b
Anastasia Mourogova Millin has 19 years of corporate banking experience and in-depth knowledge of the commercial real estate sector. She helped launch Canada’s first Schedule A impact bank – Vancity Community Investment Bank. At Vancity, she oversaw an existing $1.3-billion real estate portfolio and originated $250-million in new loans to B Corps, social enterprises and not for profits.
In her subsequent role as global director of Capital and Investments at Dark Matter Labs, Anastasia focused on building new markets for civic infrastructure, including nature based solutions such as soil and biodiversity, in order to re-imagine the existing systems of capital formation, deployment and value aggregation. Most recently she joined forces with Larry Waters to form the Ombrello Solutions partnership.
A headline from the New York Times ! Off the Grid, Extremely Online – August 14, 2024 Am I the only person that thinks this is an oxymoron? How can someone claim to be off the grid and still have a million YouTube followers? A sense of humour may be necessary if you read these […]
I have only written the occasional article over the past twenty-four months – twenty-four months working with Anastasia Mourogova-Millin on innovative concepts designed to attract financing-at-scale to invest in urban nature and bio-diversity. Recently we have re-defined our working relationship. I continue to believe in the ideas she is pioneering. However, we are at different stages […]
Anastasia Mourogova Millin, March 5, 2024 Earth’s urban population will grow by 2.5 billion people over the next 30 years. Over the same time period, urban land expansion put at risk the survival of 855 different species and will threaten the homes of over 30,000 animal and plant species. Add in the impact of climate […]
Co-working space came to mean the notorious We Work model. When I had been asked to opine on co-working I tried to steer the conversation away from the Adam Neumann / Softbank flimflam growth model. Instead, I suggested that property owners look at usage and users. While I doubted We Work’s ability to survive I […]
Before I fall completely into the trap of opposition politics, I have decided to take a break from never-ending criticism and to start suggesting solutions to the affordable housing conundrum. Do I have a plan? No, more a collection of ideas To start with, I think there are three key issues: Home ownership is not […]
I know! I am going to sound like a grumpy old man. Maybe that is because I am. I have been scratching my head in wonderment at the Taylor Swift phenomena. Is she an Incredible song writer, composer, and performer? I really don’t know! A discussion for another time? But probably not. At my age […]