Don’t build it! At least, Not In My Back Yard ! I acted as an advisor in the sale of a beautifully natural, 14-acre urban waterfront estate. Existing zoning allowed for the development of 30 to 35 single-family homes, which after road dedication would leave very little green space. I did not think that was the best use of the site. A discreet condominium project along part of the lake-front could provide over 100 new homes and leave 75% of the land and lake front as a “country park”.
The city’s urban planner agreed but advised it was a pipe dream. Large, single-family houses encircled the property and the home owners would force a referendum which could not be won. In the home owners ideal world, the site would be their private domain at no cost to them. Instead, the new owner-developer has planned an exclusive sub-division for 31 multi-million dollar homes. The developer has been creative in preserving mature trees, a country feel to a linear park along a drainage area, and a small park area on the lake. However the plan severely limits the amount of public green space at the site. The opportunity for responsible development was lost on the NIMBYs.
A new rapid transit system runs through a Montréal suburb. Its main stop is at a large regional shopping centre. The mall owner wants to build a transit-oriented rental housing project on a section of its heat island parking lot. The project incorporated green roofs and an eco-friendly landscaping design by an award-winning landscape architect. It would have to replace the surface parking to meet its mall-tenant obligations and proposed a sustainable parking structure. The NIMBY objections:
The opposition to the project has caused unnecessary delays to the development 1300 residential units – this in the middle of a housing crisis and despite the opportunity to turn black surface infrastructure to at least pale green.
Propose a project to house the homeless or working poor in a neighbourhood and watch the sparks fly. Assumptions:
Despite empirical evidence that demonstrates that if people are properly housed and integrated into a community, it has a long lasting and positive impact on all of these issues. Just not in my backyard, please!
We do need informed debate on:
However much too often, the Not In My Back Yard movement fights to:
We need thousands of new homes, great green public spaces, better transit, more active transportation, better neighbourhood retail, and far fewer cars on the road. Switch the focus to fast-track projects to Build in My Back Yard.
I know! I am going to sound like a grumpy old man. Maybe that is because I am. I have been scratching my head in wonderment at the Taylor Swift phenomena. Is she an Incredible song writer, composer, and performer? I really don’t know! A discussion for another time? But probably not. At my age […]
Don’t build it! At least, Not In My Back Yard ! I acted as an advisor in the sale of a beautifully natural, 14-acre urban waterfront estate. Existing zoning allowed for the development of 30 to 35 single-family homes, which after road dedication would leave very little green space. I did not think that was […]
We were visiting Glasgow (literally that Dear Green Place in Gaelic) to see where my father was born, grew up, and went to University. Fortunately for me, my cousin John from Australia had just visited and had met with historians, Bruce Downie and Norry Wilson. So, we too arranged to meet them in the Govanhill […]
Vienna on top again. This week both Monocle Magazine and The Economist unveiled their quality of life / most liveable city indexes. There are differences in the way each publication sets its index. So it is even more impressive that once again, Vienna tops both lists. I am a bit lazy today so rather than […]
Many Viennese went from hot bedding to superblocks overnight. Could they even imagine an apartment complex 1000 metres long built along two streets with even more massive landscaped courtyards? Could they conceive of 1400 apartment units built to house 5000 people on 56,000 square metres or 38 acres of land. Or a vertical build-out that […]
Vienna had been a poor city even before the First World War. “Normal” housing arrangements meant six to eight people sharing one room and a kitchen. Then, in early 1919, just after the Armistice, the cost of living tripled in two months. Bed lodgers could no longer afford their 8-hours a day in a shared […]